?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry Share Next Entry
Institute of Physics
khrapko_ri
Scoundrels of IOP rejected the objectionable articles with the wording
"New Journal of Physics does not reconsider articles which were previously rejected from a specialised, fellow IOP Publishing journal",
even if the article is not submitted anywhere before.
However, I have repeatedly pointed out to them:
"The IOP infallibility dogma, "It is company policy that once an article has been rejected from one Institute of Physics journal, we cannot consider it for another", means that IOP is interested in its own infallibility rather than in scientific results."
Now I got that all journals take responsibility for themselves. I ran throught five IOP journals with an article  "Spin transferred to a mirror reflecting light" and received individual rejections, which I have collected at the end of the article at http://khrapkori.wmsite.ru/ftpgetfile.php?id=158&module=files
Against this background, we were pleased by publishing of a similar article  "Reflection of light from a moving mirror" http://khrapkori.wmsite.ru/ftpgetfile.php?id=153&module=files
In this regard, the question arises, the Optik reviewer is a fool who does not understand that recognition of the spin of a plane wave depicts hundreds of famous physicists as fools, or he is a fighter against corruption, the same as I am?

Негодяи из IOP традиционно отклоняли неугодные статьи с формулировкой
"New Journal of Physics does not reconsider articles which were previously rejected from a specialised, fellow IOP Publishing journal", даже если статья никуда раньше не подавалась.
Однако я многократно указывал им:
The IOP infallibility dogma, "It is company policy that once an article has been rejected from one Institute of Physics journal, we cannot consider it for another", means that IOP is interested in its own infallibility rather than in scientific results.
Ныне я заставил все отклоняющие журналы брать ответственность на себя. Я пробежался по пяти IOP'овским журналам со статьей "Spin transferred to a mirror reflecting light" и получил индивидуальные отказы, которые я собрал в конце статьи по адресу  http://khrapkori.wmsite.ru/ftpgetfile.php?id=158&module=files
На этом фоне нам было приятно узнать о публикации аналогичной статьи  "Reflection of light from a moving mirror" http://khrapkori.wmsite.ru/ftpgetfile.php?id=153&module=files
В связи с этим возникает вопрос, рецезент Optik'ca дурачок, который не понимает, что признание спина плокой волны выставляет дураками сотни известных физиков, или он борец с коррупцией, такой же, как я?